Thursday, June 11th, 2009

Media Coverage: compare and contrast

Two nearly identical events, shootings resulting in one death and one wounded by radicalized individuals.

One gets scant media attention, one gets wall to wall 24/7 treatment.

Which is more disturbing? A recent muslim convert whose acceleration of radicalism drives him to kill in a few short years, or a life long radical who kills when he’s got one foot in the grave?

Almost every front page in the US has the Holocaust Museum shooting[, not a single front page carried the Arkansas Recruiting Center shooting except the local paper where it happened.

Remember, radicals are only radical when they are from a rightward bent.

Posted by Gabriel | Filed in Media Bias | Comment now »

Thursday, May 7th, 2009

Heh

Shamelessly stolen from here

who-run-autotown.jpg

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

Suck it Specter

as they say, lay down with snakes…

Quote:

Despite promises from Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) that Sen. Arlen Specter would retain his seniority after switching parties, Specter will be put at the end of the seniority line on all his committees but one under a resolution expected to be passed on the floor late Tuesday.

hahah fucktard, 29 years of seniority out the fucking window, and soon you will lose your seat entirely. fuck you asshole thats what you get.

Posted by Gabriel | Filed in Media Whores, Mutants, Stupid | Comment now »

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

Lisa Jackson lets the master plan slip

In response to an interview by NPR:

Consider Lisa Jackson, Obama’s EPA boss, explaining market economics during an NPR interview. “The president has said, and I couldn’t agree more, that what this country needs is one single national roadmap that tells automakers, who are trying to become solvent again, what kind of car it is that they need to be designing and building for the American people.

”Is that the role of the government?” asked the reporter. “That doesn’t sound like free enterprise.”

”Well, it is free enterprise, in a way,” declared Jackson.

Uh yeah, let me guess Lisa was an Affirmative Action candidate who didn’t bother to pay any attention at all in any econ class she took.  Furthermore, as we all came to understand, Obama’s power grab of the Auto companies has been nothing more than a move to force them to make cars no one wants, but that are “green” or whatever the fuck that means.

Remember, Obama was crafted by our esteemed press corps as a “moderate”, well so far I’ve seen no moderation at all.

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

See if anyone in comedyland was paying attention

They could have come up with this. Instead, they all cower in fear of offending “The One’s” acolytes and brainwashed masses.

Posted by Gabriel | Filed in Best Evar!, teh funney | Comment now »

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

It’s always 9/10 in the Obama Administration

Stratfor on the release of the memos and the effect on the intel community in general not good indeed:

 

Politics and moral arguments aside, the end effect of the memos’ release is that people who have put their lives on the line in U.S. counterterrorism efforts are now uncertain of whether they should be making that sacrifice. Many of these people are now questioning whether the administration that happens to be in power at any given time will recognize the fact that they were carrying out lawful orders under a previous administration. It is hard to retain officers and attract quality recruits in this kind of environment. It has become safer to work in programs other than counterterrorism.

The memos’ release will not have a catastrophic effect on U.S. counterterrorism efforts. Indeed, most of the information in the memos was leaked to the press years ago and has long been public knowledge. However, when the release of the memos is examined in a wider context, and combined with a few other dynamics, it appears that the U.S. counterterrorism community is quietly slipping back into an atmosphere of risk-aversion and malaise — an atmosphere not dissimilar to that described by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (also known as the 9/11 Commission) as a contributing factor to the intelligence failures that led to the 9/11 attacks.

This was fully to be expected and it’s my best guess is that its a two part strategy on the Obama admin’s part.

Part one is a shot across the bow to let the rank and file know that if you cross the administration they will find some way of enacting payback. The CIA during the Bush tenure was basically at war with the administration and its weapon of choice was leaking classified programs that certain liberal circles within the agency used to get even with an administration that it disagreed with on issues of politics and policy.

The second part is deeply rooted in the mindset of liberals that the war against al Qaida and global terrorism in general is an issue of law (lawfare) instead of warfare. It’s the 9/10 mindset that seems so pervasive in the current Democrat and liberal thinking, and its very dangerous. Lets face it, this administration does not take National Security seriously. Given their appointments thus far, it’s a fairly simple observation to make.

Posted by Gabriel | Filed in 911 World, Leftist Hackery, Negligence | Comment now »

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

Oh my

Does Kieth Sweat owe the Russian Mob like mad cash or something? How can their be any other explanation for this?

365black.jpg

Posted by Gabriel | Filed in Best Evar! | Comment now »

Monday, April 27th, 2009

I guess this is where the “narrative” is crafted

Secret Dinners of the Washington Media Elite

Quote:

Last Tuesday evening, Rahm Emanuel quietly slipped into an eighth-floor office at the Watergate.

As white-jacketed waiters poured red and white wine and served a three-course salmon and risotto dinner, the White House chief of staff spent two hours chatting with some of Washington’s top journalists — excusing himself to take a call from President Obama and another from Hillary Clinton.

As the journalists hurled questions and argued among themselves, Emanuel said: “This feels a lot like a Jewish family dinner.”

For more than a year, David Bradley, the Atlantic’s soft-spoken owner, has hosted these off-the-record dinners at a specially built table in his glass-enclosed office overlooking the Potomac. And the guests, from Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner to Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke to Jordan’s King Abdullah II, are as A-list as they come.

“It’s just a joy for me,” Bradley says. “These are reflective, considered conversations, which is hard to do when you’re going after headlines for the next day’s publication.” While the guests seem quite open, says the businessman who bought Atlantic a decade ago, he is new enough to journalism “that I can’t tell the difference between genuine candor and deeply rehearsed candor.”
ad_icon

Emanuel says he enjoyed the chance to “put aside the adversarial. . . . I tried to be honest and frank and hope they felt that way. They want context, they want thinking. You’re not selling, you’re presenting.”

Still, the catered gatherings also sound rather cozy, like some secret-handshake gathering of an entrenched elite. Are the top-level officials, strategists and foreign leaders there for serious questioning or risk-free spin sessions? And what exactly is the journalistic benefit if the visitors are protected by a shield of anonymity?

The guests “have either been frank with us or provided a reasonable facsimile of frankness,” says Atlantic writer Jeffrey Goldberg. “Would I like for them to be able to go on the record? Of course. But I do think you lose something because then it becomes just another press conference.”

Among those in regular attendance are David Brooks and Maureen Dowd of the New York Times, Gene Robinson and Ruth Marcus of The Washington Post, NBC’s David Gregory, ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, PBS’s Gwen Ifill, the New Yorker’s Jane Mayer, Vanity Fair’s Todd Purdum, former Time managing editor Walter Isaacson and staffers from Bradley’s Atlantic and National Journal, including Ron Brownstein, Andrew Sullivan and Jonathan Rauch.

Atlantic Editor James Bennet, along with Goldberg, pitched the idea to Bradley as a way of raising the company’s profile. “David, being almost ridiculously generous, said: ‘Why don’t we invite some of your colleagues?’ ” Goldberg recalls.

Bradley, a native Washingtonian, had long been intrigued by the Sperling breakfasts, the 35-year ritual conducted by the Christian Science Monitor’s Godfrey Sperling until his retirement. But those were on-the-record affairs open to any hungry journalist, while Bradley’s dinners are both uber-exclusive and decidedly discreet.

Politicians have been sharing off-the-record meals and drinks with reporters roughly forever. During the transition, Obama attended a three-hour dinner with conservative columnists at George Will’s Chevy Chase home.

Take note, that almost all of the named “journalists” on this list are heavily pro-Obama, and were somehow involved in the Presidential debates. More disturbing is how tight they appear with members of the Obama admin/inner circle.

Posted by Gabriel | Filed in Corruption, Media Bias, Political Hackery | Comment now »

Monday, April 20th, 2009

Obama drops a latte from the budget

President Obama plans to convene his Cabinet for the first time today, and he will order its members to identify a combined $100 million in budget cuts over the next 90 days, according to a senior administration official

Quote:

Just to be clear: $100 million represents .003 percent of $3.5 trillion.

To put those numbers in perspective, imagine that the head of a household with annual spending of $100,000 called everyone in the family together to deal with a $34,000 budget shortfall. How much would he or she announce that spending had be cut? By $3 over the course of the year–approximately the cost of one latte at Starbucks. The other $33,997? We can put that on the family credit card and worry about it next year.

heh. I saw this mentioned on CNN this morning and was simply amazed that they were hyping it. Wow 100 million, why not the 8 billion in that pork sandwich called the “stimulus” bill? Seriously, 100 million in a 3.5 Trillion budget and its getting news play? Oh the desperation.

Thursday, April 16th, 2009

Tea Party Protests expose media as deeply ignorant and still in the tank for Obama

Unless you lived under a rock yesterday Tea Party tax protests shot up all over the country, and as if on cue, the mouthpieces for Team Obama in the media were there to ignore the obvious, and focus their attention primarily on a handful of loons that showed up.

Case in point, CNN Yeah thats right, focus in on the one guy with the Obama Hitler sign, ignore the hundreds of other signs, and then craft a narrative that paints these people as mostly morons and idiots and obviously only Republicans, oh and don’t forget “Fox News” who seems to control everyone with an opinion to the right of Glenn Greenwald.

Also one couldn’t ignore the onslaught of the “teabagging” meme that was pervasive throughout all 3 of MSNBC’s “shows” as well as Anderson Coopers news of the day that its hard to talk when youre “teabagging”

Oh and for shits and giggles, irrelevant hack, Frankenstein’s Monster Impersonator, and sometime contributor to Vanity Fair James Wolcott getting essentially his ass handed to him by none other than CSPAN.

My favorite lines to come out of yesterdays media “coverage” was the bemoaning of the use of children as props. Yes it happened, but I don’t ever recall the press ever focusing on it before. Especially given the abhorent use of children as props at nearly every fucking lefty “insert cause here” rally/protest I’ve ever seen.

Posted by Gabriel | Filed in MSM, Obamamessiah, disgusted | Comment now »